• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

The concept of offering support, particularly in the context of accompanying individuals with health conditions, has been a widely accepted practice in various settings including workplaces, schools, and societies.

However, this practice has also been exposed to criticism, with many claiming that it empowers and erodes social inequalities that are rooted in societal biases.

On one hand, the idea behind escorting someone with a impairment is to ensure safety. In contrast, this 'act of kindness' can also be perceived as a paternalistic gesture that erodes the self-reliance and decision-making capacity of the individual being escorted.

Through escorting someone, we are basically removing them of their agency and critical thinking abilities, implying that they are inadequate of managing the world on their own.

As power dynamic is stemming from preconceived notions, with the provider exerting a superior level of power and influence over the individual being escorted.

Such is a reflection of the societal values that value independence and self-reliance, assuming that people with impairments are inherently intolerant and fragile.

This notion is not only limiting but furthermore exploitative, as it withholds people with health conditions the opportunity to contribute fully in their communities and self-advocate.

In addition, escorting can also be viewed as a form of systemic exclusion, blocking individuals with disabilities from participating in certain spaces or facilities that are viewed as difficult to access for them.

By categorizing someone as unable to navigate certain spaces, we are essentially deciding for them what they can and cannot do, restricting their choices and independence.

Recognizing and disrupting these power dynamics requires a transformation in perspective. We require to move away from a paternalistic perspective and towards a more liberating style that prioritizes the independence and decision-making capacity of individuals with impairments.

Such means participating people with impairments in the problem-solving process and requesting their ideas and responses. It also means respecting their capacity for self-advocacy and independence.

Ultimately, our objective should be to create a expanded open and approachable atmosphere, where people with impairments have the equitable choices and choices as anyone else.

Such requires a essential transformation of our societal values and attitudes, drifting towards a society of protectionism and embracing one that emphasizes and promotes independence, escorts Washington decision-making capacity, and equality.